In this post, I’ll share how I plan to use a YouTube video titled “What Is Cyber Security | How It Works? | Cyber Security In 7 Minutes |” from Simplilearn in my cyber security course. I’ll address several key aspects to demonstrate how this video can effectively engage students and enhance their learning.

1. What kind of interaction would the video require from your students? Does it force them to respond in some way (inherent)?

The video requires students to actively listen and understand key concepts in cyber security, such as different types of cyber attacks and security practices. This initial interaction sets the stage for deeper engagement.

2. In what way are they likely to respond to the video on their own, e.g., make notes, do an activity, or think about the topic (learner-generated)?

Students might take notes, highlight important points, or pause and reflect on the concepts presented. This active note-taking and reflection helps them internalize the material.

3. What activity could you suggest that they do after they have watched the video (designed)? What type of knowledge or skill would that activity help develop? What medium or technology would students use to do the activity?

After watching the video, I would ask students to participate in a group discussion or forum where they can identify and analyze a recent cyber attack from the news using the concepts learned from the video. This activity promotes critical thinking and application of theoretical knowledge. An online discussion board or a collaborative platform like Google Docs would be ideal for this activity.

4. How would students get feedback on the activity that you set? What medium or technology would they and/or you use for getting and giving feedback on their activity?

Students would receive feedback through peer reviews and instructor comments on the discussion board or collaborative document. This approach allows for diverse perspectives and constructive criticism. The chosen technology for feedback would support detailed annotations and threaded comments.

5. How much work for you would that activity cause? Would the work be both manageable and worthwhile? Could the activity be scaled for larger numbers of students?

The workload for managing this activity is moderate but valuable, as it provides insights into students’ understanding. For larger classes, forming smaller discussion groups or assigning peer reviewers can help maintain a manageable workload while ensuring comprehensive feedback for everyone.

6. How could the video have been designed to generate more or better activity from viewers or students?

The video could be more engaging by incorporating interactive elements such as embedded quizzes or prompts that pause the video and ask students to reflect on key points before proceeding. This would encourage active participation and reinforce learning.

7. How will you address any potential barriers for your learners in the use of this video to ensure an inclusive design?

To ensure inclusivity, I would provide transcripts and closed captions for the video, accommodating students with hearing impairments. Additionally, offering supplementary text materials and ensuring the video content is accessible in multiple languages would support non-native English speakers.